• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 07:51:14 -0700

>I hope the flow of information isn't impeded by anybody
>feeling that they have to watch what they say.

It is worse than that.  Have you noticed that most, if not all, of the
participants in this discussion are 'independents'?  I don't see anyone from
Microsoft or Sun jumping up and down over this issue.

The effects are clear, but the cause is confidential.

Don Park
Docuverse


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
    • From: Mark Nutter <mnutter@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: arbitrary characters in XML document?
• Next by Date: Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
• Next by thread: Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread