Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 01:37 PM 9/2/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote: >There's no giant surprise lurking anywhere. The same arguments we're having >here about the use and appropriateness of namespaces in general occur >(probably) within every Working Group -- yes, that makes a case for further >work there, but it's not something the *HTML Working Group* is going to be >chartered to solve. > >If you'll recall, the group's *original* draft had 3, we, for a time, went >to 1, but reversed ourselves back to the original position. > >No Hand of God action there. Okay, I'll keep that in mind the next time a Proposed Recommendation shows enormous differences between its content and the previous Working Draft. I don't think God's involved (certainly hope not), but it seems like an awfully large thing to do on the way to a PR. You can deny it all you like, but it smells pretty ugly to this long-time W3C watcher. No rationale + sudden leap at PR stage -> No confidence. Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer (2nd Ed - September) Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
