• From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• To: "'Joshua E. Smith'" <jesmith@k...>, Shinichiro HAMADA <shinichiro.hamada@t...>, - XML-Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:15:18 -0700

Actually, much XML is transmitted in a binary form today, thanks to the LZ
compression built into modern modems.  As Joshua Smith observed, XML
compresses amazingly well (in my tests, many documents compress to between
five and ten percent of their original size).  And, as others have observed,
much value in XML comes from the fact that it is text-based.

Before investing in a non-textual equivalent of XML, I recommend carefully
looking at whether and where such a thing is actually needed.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by Date: RE: Another look at namespaces
• Previous by thread: Unicode surrogate block in XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Binary-encoding of XML for communication
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread