• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 18:12:06 -0700

David Megginson wrote:
> 
> The problem in the W3C is that even a 100% majority cannot override a
> directorial veto; the benefit is that it's relatively easy for the
> members to vote with their feet.

I'm not sure that it's fair to say folk can vote with their feet;
where will their feet take them if they need to work with the web?

I do agree the capability of such directatorial vetos is an issue;
the role of a tie-breaker isn't what we see today.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Next by Date: Re: namespace of attributes?
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Next by thread: Re: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread