• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 07:36:54 -0700

roddey@u... wrote:
> 
> >Adding three lines of code introduces the opportunity for three times
> >the bugs in a real application? I don't buy it. Looking for "HTML 4.0
> >strict" OR "HTML 4.0 frameset" is no harder than looking for "UL" OR
> >"OL", if the software is set up right.

> I think its more complex than that. Its more than adding 3 lines of code. What
> if you want to validate the XHTML? 

I can validate all three variants of XHTML using parsers that are three
years old already!!!! Download the DTD, download nsgmls or IE5 and try
it yourself!

 Paul Prescod



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Open Forum on Metadata Registries: CFParticipation
    • From: Avi Rappoport <xml@s...>
  • Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
    • From: roddey@u...

• Prev by Date: Re: Groves, the next big thing (Re: ANN: XML and Databases article)
• Next by Date: RE: MSXML for Java Questions
• Previous by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread