• From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• To: 'XML-Dev Mailing list' <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 20:33:11 +0100

Don Park wrote:
> Mark Birbeck wrote:
> > Obviously when everything has been tidied up, and modules of 
> > XHTML are being used, then you will only need the namespaces
> > for the modules you want to use, and there will be no need
> > for three.
> 
> Namespaces for individual modules?  Where did this idea come 
> from?  XHTML modularization is done by building DTDs using the
> modules as components.

If you are using modules within other documents and want to validate,
you need schemas and namespaces. The current discussion document (on
modularization) suggests a way of using DTDs, but it's pretty crude, and
will fail in many situations (as the document acknowledges).

Mark

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Required Reading (was Re: Who needs XHTML Namespace?)
• Next by Date: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why namespaces?
• Next by thread: RE: Why namespaces?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread