• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: "XML-DEV" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 01:39:38 +0800

From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

 >I think the problem is the bad idea that content models *define* a
> language rather than simply *describe* or *declare* it.  The "blink"
> element is not strict HTML; it is only an artifact of the formalism
> used to describe HTML (content models on the child axis) that using
> a blink attribute should require the child element to be transitional
HTML.

"child element" should be "containing element"

Rick


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: code generation from XML datatype definitions: anyone interested?
• Next by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Previous by thread: importing xml document in another
• Next by thread: What XHTML should do with namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread