• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Matthew Gertner <matthew@p...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:08:05 -0500

Matthew Gertner wrote:
> Throwing these together in a 1000 page document is not a
> recipe for commercial success. It seems to be an unambiguously good
> thing that these concepts are now being split into bite-sized chunks in
> the process of transfering them into an XML context.

Unless you want to point to one authoritative definition with one
namespace reference. :-)

The good news is that the significant achievement of those 
who created HyTime is being recognized even as the adaptation continues.

Learning takes time and patience.  Understanding requires application.

len


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC)
    • From: "Reynolds, Gregg" <greynolds@d...>
  • Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC)
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
  • Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC)
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: unsubscribe
• Previous by thread: Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC)
• Next by thread: Re: groves dissent (was RE: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread