• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: "'Daniel Veillard'" <Daniel.Veillard@w...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:28:59 -0700

"Hunter, David" wrote:
> 
> From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:Daniel.Veillard@w...]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 5:14 AM
> 
> <snip/>
> > I guess Ann
> > and other members of that working group did explain the reasons of
> > their technical decision.
> <snip/>
> 
> Let me just echo Simon St. Laurent:
> 
> No.  We have no reason.  We have nothing.

Aye -- nothing.  An "official" W3C rationale is still lacking;
odd since this decision seems to fly in the face of the clear
intent of the XML namespaces spec.

"A html:rose is a strict:rose is a frameset:rose ... "

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: CNET on XHTML
    • From: "Hunter, David" <dhunter@M...>

• Prev by Date: Re: COM XML parser
• Next by Date: Element Tags vs Attributes
• Previous by thread: RE: CNET on XHTML
• Next by thread: ANN: Oracle XML Parser for Java v2.0.2 - Production Release
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread