• From: Arjun Ray <aray@q...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 02:19:00 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> Firstly, W3C does not control XML to the extent that they can control
> other syntaxes, because XML is SGML. 

XML is a W3C trademark.  I think that settles the "ownership" question.

> Secondly, I think that if Microsoft made a successor to XML, it is quite
> possible it could be better than XML is, learning from experience. 

Just as Outlook Express is a "better" newsreader than the many that went
before.

Experience is one thing.  Track record is another.

> If Microsoft cares to give me a million dollars, I am prepared to
> develop such a thing! 

But Ricko, that's why they won't give you a million dollars!;)


Arjun



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: an unfilled need
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: an unfilled need
• Next by Date: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML
• Previous by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Next by thread: XML belongs to itself. (Re: an unfilled need)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread