• From: "Erik James Freed" <ejfreed@i...>
• To: "joubin" <joubin@i...>, "Kay Michael" <Michael.Kay@i...>, "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1999 12:20:30 -0700

I always wondered why the Java name space semantics and syntax were not
used. The heirarchical 'dot' notation has pretty broad acceptance...

I know -get my head out of the clouds :-()

erik

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xml-dev@i... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@i...]On Behalf Of
joubin
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 11:28 AM
To: Kay Michael; XMLDev list
Subject: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)


From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@i...>

>I seem to recall, at the time Namespaces was being debated, a lone voice
>saying that of course namespaces should be hierarchic rather than
>single-level. Shame that none listened.

Exactly.  The whole point of URI/URL schemas (AFAIU) is to map hierarchical
spaces.

But XML-NS simply uses the cumbersome notation (it ain't, strictly speaking,
pretty) when the __information__ that the notational system is designed to
convey is disregarded?

(Further motivation:  A hierarchical naming context will greatly facilitate
'modularization'.)


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
    • From: "joubin" <joubin@i...>

• Prev by Date: listserver gone mad ? (was: Re: ATTN:....)
• Next by Date: Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
• Previous by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread