• From: Arjun Ray <aray@q...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 22:54:57 -0400 (EDT)

On 27 Sep 1999, David Megginson wrote:

> Unfortunately, AFs came out with three strikes against them: they were
> developed by ISO (yawn!), they were introduced as an appendix to the
> very long and intense HyTime spec (awk!), and they weren't very webby
> (oops!).  They also hit a foul with their convoluted mechanism for
> attribute mapping.

And they were ejected by the Ump for failing to give C++ programmers warm
fuzzy feelings. 

> I agree with Eliot Kimber and others, though, that eventually XML will
> need something like AFs.

Then I gotta "disagree"... XML needs something like AFs *now*!


Arjun



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: groves dissent
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Next by Date: Check this
• Previous by thread: Re: groves dissent
• Next by thread: Want to speak about Java/XML/Graphics in Houston in November?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread