Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 12:22 PM 9/3/99 +0100, Mark Birbeck wrote: >Ann Navarro wrote: >> However, moving forward from HTML 4.0, which is what the >> future work in XHTML does, isn't necessarily bound. > >I know, but I'm being more specific; won't you have to leave the legacy >namespaces untouched when you move forward? Pardon the Friday morning confusion, but ....so? Have 3 now -- have 1 for modularization (or whatever the result is) -- everyone deals with it. Just as you'll deal with the namespaces from any other mix-and-match portion that people will be coming up with. This really is a non-problem for me. (and yes, I know that is one side of a very wide gulf) Ann --- Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials Coming in September --- Mastering XML Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
