• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 11:28:51 -0700

Mark Birbeck wrote:
> 
> So, how else do you make the distinction? You can't use DTDs if the
> XHTML is inside another doc - so what else?

But "XHTML inside another doc" is the very combining of vocabularies
(modularization etc) that XHTML 1.0 isn't intended to address.

In fact the XHTML PR (gaak) talks only about XHTML "documents" in all
places I saw when I just re-scanned it.  Only document and user agent
conformance is defined.  That sort of vocabulary combining isn't part
of the first release.

You can't use the notion of an XHTML "module" as the motivation for
a feature, when that feature isn't supposed to be part of XHTML.

- Dave

p.s. As a concrete answer to the "how do you make the distinction",
	the answer is to declare the rules you're using to combine
	those various namespaces.  A million different sets of rules?
	Quite easily.  Not a million namespaces for a long time.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Why namespaces?
    • From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by Date: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: Why namespaces?
• Next by thread: Why namespaces?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread