Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 03:05 PM 9/16/99 -0700, Andrew Layman wrote: >A little more courtesy should be extended to the members of the HTML WG. Could you please let us know precisely what it is that you're objecting to? A number of W3C-affiliated folks are griping, but, to be honest, I don't see any discourtesy, just a large number of serious questions. (Your message didn't cite any examples.) If anything, I see W3C folk turning back serious questions with personal reactions and overstated rhetoric that borders on contempt and ridicule. While it is unfortunate that a seemingly large number of XML-dev folk disagree with the work of the HTML WG, I don't see much flamethrowing going on. Some folks may interpret disagreement as personal attacks, but I can't see I've seen cause for that lately. Just curious, Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer (2nd Ed - September) Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
