• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:32:45 -0400 (EDT)

I have been investigating the class of Extenders with a view to a
second part to my XML/Unicoded-3.0 proposal.  I find that three
characters which Unicode classifies as extenders were mysteriously
omitted from the XML category:

	U+0640 ARABIC TATWEEL
	U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK
	U+0EC6 LAO KO LA

Can anyone comment on why this was done?  Unless there is a compelling
reason not to,  I would like to bring Unicode and XML in sync here
by adding these as name characters, plus the new character
U+1843 MONGOLIAN LETTER TODO LONG VOWEL SIGN.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Wrong list?
• Next by Date: CNET on XHTML
• Previous by thread: Unicode 3.0 is no longer beta
• Next by thread: Re: Extenders (BNF rule 89)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread