Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Brownell wrote: > Mark Birbeck wrote: > > > > So, how else do you make the distinction? You can't use DTDs if the > > XHTML is inside another doc - so what else? > > But "XHTML inside another doc" is the very combining of vocabularies > (modularization etc) that XHTML 1.0 isn't intended to address. > I understand modularization (in the context of XHTML) to be the breaking up XHTML into a number of modules - tables, lists, block text features, scripts and so on. I understand "XHTML inside another document" to be something different, and is illustrated by the MathML example in the proposal. As with any mixing of vocabularies in a document, it requires a namespace for each vocabulary. XHTML 1.0 *is* intended to address that, although through no fault of its own, it cannot create combined documents that can be validated. Mark xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
