[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • To: xml-dev@i...
  • Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 05:52:58 -0400 (EDT)

Ann Navarro writes:

 > >but I don't imagine that DMOZ or RPMFind will be
 > >able to become conformant any time soon because they have extremely
 > >large user bases with the old Namespace URI hard-coded in their
 > >software.
 > 
 > In all objectiveness, isn't that more a problem of it being "hard
 > coded" than of a change in URI?

That's the whole point of this discussion: Namespace URIs are
necessarily hard-coded in documents and applications.  That's why many
of us want exactly one, persistent XHTML Namespace URI.

In this case, DMOZ and RPMFind did hard-code the Namespace URI before
RDF-Syntax went to REC, so technically, they're to blame; however, it
is unfortunately that the last-minute change robbed RDF of the chance
of having two very highly-visible and heavily-used conformant
implementations.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member