Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Carlisle wrote: > > [in response to my claim, that] > > > It is the parsers which cause the problem by ignoring the information > > provided. > > ... > > Ah interesting. But then the `problem' is that there is no REC or NOTE > or hint or suggestion from anyone in authority that namespace aware > validating parsers are _supposed_ to interpret xmlns: attribute > declarations in this way. As the recommendation does not say anything about this, it does not prohibit it. There was a discussion about this nine months ago (upon release of rec-xml-names-19990114), at which time the authoritative opinion was that such an interpretation was not intended by the specification, as it would invert the validity-status of some documents. I argued then, and remain convined, that that effect would be beneficial. > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
