• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@t...>, "Mark Birbeck" <Mark.Birbeck@i...>, "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 11:20:12 -0400

At 07:52 AM 9/3/99 -0700, Jeff Greif wrote:

>The ability to put XML inside XHTML is more problematic.  Has anyone ever
>proposed some kind deferred validation 

Importing XML content into an XHTML document is also a function of
modularization. Validation rules and how that might be accomplished is an
open issue. 

Ann

---

Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Coming in September --- Mastering XML

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>
  • Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why namespaces?
• Next by Date: Wanted an XML DTD for an MSDS (848)
• Previous by thread: Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by thread: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread