• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: eliot@i...
• Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 19:56:52 -0400 (EDT)

W. Eliot Kimber scripsit:

> While logically there is no difference between the internal and external
> subsets, XML defines slightly different rules for how the internal and
> external subsets must be processed. This reflects common (although
> misguided, IMNSHO) practice and makes things easier for processors that
> don't do validation and therefore don't need to process the
> declarations.

Even non-validating XML processors need to process at least some of
the declarations.  In particular, notation and unparsed-entity
declarations must be passed to the application, and ATTLIST
declarations must be used and understood.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Why namespaces?
• Next by Date: Re: Who needs XHTML Namespace?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why namespaces?
• Next by thread: Re: How much extra code for multiple Namespaces?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread