• From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>
• To: "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 11:48:30 -0700

On 7 Sep 99, at 11:15, Ronald Bourret wrote:

> I've only briefly been following this whole discussion, but I don't think 
> anybody has asked for names of who wanted one namespace and who wanted 
> three and who wanted the discussion to simply end because they were late 
> for a flight.

I agree that technical reasons for why the spec is the way it is, and 
reasons for change, should be made public. Particularly when the 
issue is controversial, as this one is. 


Lauren

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: confidentiality in W3C WGs
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Database/Repository with content indexing ?
• Next by Date: First draft of proposed XML TC for Unicode 3.0 (unofficial)
• Previous by thread: RE: confidentiality in W3C WGs
• Next by thread: Re: confidentiality in W3C WGs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread