• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 16:07:30 -0700

At 06:13 PM 9/2/99 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
>I'd be
>happy just with an XHTML NOTE that looked something like this:

Actually, you're not giving the WG enough credit.  There are a bunch of
other tricky little issues they had to deal with, like upper-lower
case and so on.

But I agree that a single way for programmers to address HTML markup
would have been a huge benefit, and it's a pity we're not getting that.
 -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: This is getting silly
• Next by Date: OPEN LETTER: Standards must stand on their own
• Previous by thread: This is getting silly
• Next by thread: OPEN LETTER: Standards must stand on their own
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread