• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 16:24:20 -0400 (EDT)

Ann Navarro scripsit:

> >I'll take that as 'No comment', as the process document for the W3C already
> >indicates that what you describe above must have happened, and as that
> >description provides no further light on a complicated question.
> 
> What do you want me to say, Simon? 

[silly story snipped]

What Simon wants, of course, is the rationale.  *What* was the compelling
argument that made the HTML WG reverse itself on this point, so close
to PR?

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
    • From: Mark Nutter <mnutter@f...>
  • Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: StarOffice
• Next by Date: Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
• Previous by thread: Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
• Next by thread: Re: Consensus and Community (W3C and xml-dev)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread