• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 09:22:19 -0700

At 03:15 PM 9/2/99 +0200, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
>Actually, that's a real worry. After all, how would we know about such a
>decision except for its expression in the various drafts? So far, the facts
>I'm aware of are consistent with the W3C deciding to go in the "namespace ==
>schema" way, and are inconsistent with any other interpretation.

I assure you, this question is very much open.  Open not only in the sense
of "no decision's been taken" but open in the sense that "no obvious
consensus has yet emerged."  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML & Schemas
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why namespaces?
• Next by Date: Re: Fw: Fw: XHTML & Schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML & Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread