• From: yimin zhu <yiminz@t...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 08:16:50 -0700

While mapping graphs, say UML models into XML-data schema, what will happen
if I do not use "canonical form"? I mean entity properties are mapped to
subelements rather than attributes? Does anyone ran into the same problem
before?

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Why namespaces?
• Next by Date: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Previous by thread: XML parser using lex & yacc
• Next by thread: RE: canonical form
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread