• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 09:17:47 +0800

> This raises a major question about the utility of namespaces in a
> vocabulary that cannot be mixed with other vocabularies.

Exactly. As I suggested on the XML Plenary list,

"we would only need separate namespaces for each flavour of XHTML if people
are going to want to mix the three flavours in the one document and
distinguish the different usages of the element/attributes names in the
intersection."

James (who's feeling in a one-namespace mood today)
--
James Tauber / jtauber@j... / www.jtauber.com
Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com,  www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net
<pipe>Ceci n'est pas une pipe</pipe>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why namespaces?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Why namespaces?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Apples and Oranges
• Next by Date: etymology of "XSDL"
• Previous by thread: Schema problems
• Next by thread: Re: Why namespaces?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread