Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 02:05 PM 8/30/99 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >Assuming that the WG has a clear, though unstated, roadmap for integrating >its usage of namespaces with future XML schema developments seems like a >very bad idea indeed. Wait a minute, nobody has said that. How does the HTML WG have the power to "integrate" it's uage of namespaces with someone else's work product? This is where assumptions lead to alot of misinformation and assertions that the sky is falling. We can certainly sit here and poke sticks at the process, but it's what we have to work with right now. Within this process, it is a given that non-participants and non-member-employee individuals won't have direct access to the drafts that haven't yet been made public. I don't think we're really here to argue the appropriateness of that right now. But that lag in information dissemination shouldn't be a platform for leaps in assumption either. The people working on these things aren't stupid -- nor are they unaware of conversations like this one, in this forum and in many others. Ann --- Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials Coming in September --- Mastering XML Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
