• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 08:52:13 -0400 (EDT)

Mark Birbeck writes:

 > I think a number of contributors have very patiently explained that
 > this is only XHTML 1.0. It handles the ability to process HTML as
 > if it were XML, and for that we should be grateful. I'm using that
 > feature quite a lot.

While we're still a ways away from having schemas that allow
document-type assembly from other schemas, the most important task for 
XHTML (other than saying that XHTML should be well-formed XML, which
is a bit of a truisim), is to establish an XHTML Namespace so that
processors can discover HTML markup in arbitrary XML documents.   We
don't need Namespace-aware schemas or anything else to do that.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
    • From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>

• Prev by Date: Over 10,000 XHTML authors?
• Next by Date: How much extra code for multiple Namespaces?
• Previous by thread: RE: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by thread: Question: How to save an XML file locally using DOM in IE5?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread