• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>, David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 10:30:05 -0700

At 10:07 AM 8/16/99 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>Hmm, the XML spec never quite seemed clear about that to me.  It didn't
>quite include a definition of the term "ignorable whitespace".

Correct, because it doesn't use the the term.  Section 2.10 says:

 An XML processor must always pass all characters in a document that are 
 not markup through to the application. A validating XML processor must also 
 inform the application which of these characters constitute white space 
 appearing in element content. 

Element content is a hyperlink to the formal definition of an element
where the DTD says you can have only other elemennts.

What's not clear here? -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: I'm on the edge and I need a push...
• Next by Date: Re: White Space
• Previous by thread: Re: White Space
• Next by thread: RE: White Space
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread