• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "'XML-Dev Mailing list'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:46:56 -0400 (EDT)

Don Park writes:

 > 1. We are diverging into W3C-as-evil-empire topic here.  Lets focus
 > and remain on topic.

Agreed.  After all, when the W3C screws up, the world just shrugs and
ignores it (again, look at http://www.w3.org/TR/#Recommendations and
count how many are actually in widespread use).

 > 2. The scene looks like a gang of rowdy engineers ganging up on one woman.

That's hardly how I'd describe Paul Prescod (though he is gentle and
soft-spoken when he's not talking about Python).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: "Erik James Freed" <ejfreed@i...>
  • RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespace handling in XML Processors
• Next by Date: XML Schema!!
• Previous by thread: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by thread: Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread