Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Ann Navarro writes:
> At 10:54 AM 8/29/99 -0700, Dave Winer wrote:
> >As the developer of web content management software, and the webmaster for
> >over a dozen active websites, here's what I think XHTML should be.
> >
> >1. A tightening up of HTML. Eliminate the anomalies, like <li>, <img>, <p>
> >that in HTML can appear without balancing </li>, </img>, </p> tags. XHTML
> >pages should be well-formed XML, with mods to HTML to bring it into
> >well-formedness.
> >
> >That's it. Nothing more
>
>
> And that's exactly the intention of XHTML 1.0.
There's a little more -- XHTML 1.0 also *requires* the use of one of
the three XHTML Namespaces and of a DOCTYPE declaration, and hints at
a future system of modules.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@m...
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
