• From: "Mike Spreitzer" <spreitze@p...>
• To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:35:00 PDT

> Also I'd like your opinion on the maintainability of this route. It
> seems to me that once you generate the DTD and distribute it to your
> business partners, internal customers and so forth, it takes on a life
> of its own separate from the UML model. Changes must now be considered
> in terms of backwards compatibility at the XML, not UML level.
> Documentation is mostly at the XML level, etc.

Why wouldn't you distribute the real source (XMI?)?  That seems better
than distributing something derived in a standard way from the source.

Mike


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: More chaos coming down the pike
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: More chaos coming down the pike
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: XML and Schema
• Next by Date: ANN: DATAX 1.0beta (DATA Exchange in XML) Library
• Previous by thread: Re: More chaos coming down the pike
• Next by thread: Re: More chaos coming down the pike
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread