• From: "E.L. Willighagen" <egonw@s...>
• To: jjc@j..., xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 11:22:23 +0200 (MET DST)

i agree, this is a flaw...

to anyone on the W3C working group on XSLT: why hasn't a <xsl:doctypedefinition> been       
developed? I guess there is a reason...

Egon

PS. i carbon copied this message to James Clark, editor of the working draft on XSLT


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: no DOCTYPE in XSL
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
• Next by Date: Re: no DOCTYPE in XSL
• Previous by thread: RE: xml-dev Digest V1 #343
• Next by thread: Re: no DOCTYPE in XSL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread