• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 12:58:56 -0400 (EDT)

schen@f... writes:

 > If you have such a mechanism then it should be fairly trivial to map all
 > three XHTML namespaces into one, if as you say 99% of applications will
 > treat them all the same anyway.  Then it is nowhere near the extra amount
 > of code that you claim?  If you could, pls give an example!

I'll give two: XSL and XPointer.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • How much extra code for multiple Namespaces?
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: How much extra code for multiple Namespaces?
    • From: <schen@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by Date: ANNOUNCE: new version of search engine for XML documents
• Previous by thread: Re: How much extra code for multiple Namespaces?
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread