• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 18:50:24 -0400

At 03:46 PM 8/29/99 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:

>The gripe is with this silly 3-namespace notion, which materially decreases
>the utility of XHTML and establishes a violently dangerous precedent.

There's where we disagree.

I *could* go either way on the namespaces personally.  Some very persuasive 
arguments brought me (and the group) back around to three.

I think it's a bit melodramatic, however, to categorize this issue as a 
"violently dangerous precedent".

Ann

---
Ann Navarro
Author: Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Buy it Online!    http://www.webgeek.com/about.html
Owner, WebGeek Communications   http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President, HTML Writers Guild   http://www.hwg.org

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by Date: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Previous by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by thread: RE: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread