• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>, "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 09:53:33 -0400

At 09:30 AM 8/29/99 +0200, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:

>Providing three different namespaces which have the same semantics would
>force application writers to abandon this assumption. In XHTML,
>'traditional:p', 'strict:p' and 'frameset:p' are the same thing.


They are? Really?

Is <p> the same as <p align=center> ?  Or does that transitional:p have 
it's own semantic of allowing presentational attributes?

Ann (gee, wasn't the last argument *against* XHTML the idea that it DID 
bring semantics to XML?)






xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
    • From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>

• Prev by Date: [Fwd: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)]
• Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)]
• Previous by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread