• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: "Braden N . McDaniel" <braden@e...>
• Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 16:36:38 -0400

At 04:36 PM 8/29/99 -0400, Braden N . McDaniel wrote:

>Definitely. Or, which HTML 4.0-conforming browsers did you have in mind?
>
>Certainly HTML has succeeded, but HTML 4.0 just isn't a reality on the Web 
>yet. I don't consider that successful.

It's not?

How is it less a reality than HTML 3.2? Which browsers fully conform to 
that? (DTD requirements and all?)
---
Ann Navarro
Author: Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Buy it Online!    http://www.webgeek.com/about.html
Owner, WebGeek Communications   http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President, HTML Writers Guild   http://www.hwg.org

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
    • From: "Braden N . McDaniel" <braden@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by Date: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Previous by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Next by thread: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread