• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:04:27 -0400

Paul Prescod wrote:

> I consider it a limitation of the infoset that it supports some types of
> applications and not others. It may still be rectified. The spec. already
> has a concept of optional information items so I would expect (e.g.) CDATA
> and unknown entity reference to fall into that category.

And so they do.

-- 
	John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan	cowan@c...
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! / Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau / Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.
			-- Coleridge / Politzer

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is CDATA "structure"?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • RE: Is CDATA "structure"?
    • From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@i...>
  • Re: Is CDATA "structure"?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?
• Next by Date: Re: Units of Measure
• Previous by thread: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?
• Next by thread: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread