• From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
• To: John Martin <John.Martin@n...>
• Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 14:43:47 -0400

At 02:02 PM 7/6/1999 -0400, John Martin wrote:
>Would I code my DTD [actually, your document!] as
><POLICY-EFFECTIVE>
><POLICY-EFFECTIVE-HEADING>Effective Date:</POLICY-EFFECTIVE-HEADING>
><POLICY-EFFECTIVE-DATE>July 1, 1999</POLICY-EFFECTIVE-DATE>
></POLICY-EFFECTIVE>
>
>Or would it be better/more efficient to code it as:
>
><POLICY-EFFECTIVE-DATE>July 1, 1999</POLICY-EFFECTIVE-DATE>
>
>and add the heading in with XSL.

It's kind of a toss-up, I think. One thing to consider, though, is that
your first choice will work as is (w/out XSL) with CSS1- and
partial-CSS2-compliant browsers which don't yet support CSS's
generated-text feature. The first choice also makes it easier to customize
headings which might vary by document instance; whether that's an issue
depends on your application.

=============================================================
John E. Simpson          | It's no disgrace t'be poor, 
simpson@p...      | but it might as well be.
                         |            -- "Kin" Hubbard

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Headings: XML vs. XSL
• Next by Date: XML and COBOL
• Previous by thread: Re: Headings: XML vs. XSL
• Next by thread: XML and COBOL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread