Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Barclay Blair wrote: > > Rob and Gavin, > > Thanks for the responses -- very interesting! I always enjoy exchanging > ideas (or barbs, as the case may be, Gavin :)). I have some concerns that > we're in danger of boring the rest of the group with the semantics of form > presentation etc., so I'd be happy to continue the discussion individually > with each of you, instead of on the list. That is, unless the group or > yourselves feel strongly about continuing the dialogue on the list. This discussion, while quite interesting, is clearly inappropriate for this list - as Tim noted. But I do have a (hopefully) more relevant question. As someone who has only begun to look into both technologies/products, I have yet to determine whether each technology/product will allow me to interact with their forms using standard DOM/SAX methods. From what I've seen so far I'm concerned that this need to capture presentation aspects of a form might be leading to proprietary development within the underlying specs. I'm envisioning working with XML-based forms in the context of a larger XML-enabled process and I'd hate to get tied into a single product to support that requirement. Again, I haven't had a chance to go far enough yet. But feel free to enlighten me please. Thanks. Mike xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
