• From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@a...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:51:22 -0500

At 00:37 1999 07 28 +0100, Richard Tobin wrote:
>... The solution is
>to use a "double-escape" in the definition, like this:
>
>     <!ENTITY amp "&#x0026;#x0026;">
>
>or equivalently
>
>     <!ENTITY amp "&#38;#38;">
>
>which is the "canonical" definition given in the XML spec.

I don't believe the first version is allowed despite your
claim that it is equivalent to the second.  I believe the
section 4.6 of the XML spec [1] requires that any declaration
of pre-defined entities to match *exactly* that shown in the
table therein.

paul

[1]  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-predefined-ent
 

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Use of '&' in element of XML Document
• Next by Date: Re: Use of '&' in element of XML Document
• Previous by thread: Re: Use of '&' in element of XML Document
• Next by thread: Re: Use of '&' in element of XML Document
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread