[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • To: <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:07:42 +0800


From: John E. Simpson <simpson@p...>

>It's possible I'm missing something extremely (perversely) subtle, but
I
>don't get the sense of "*cannot* redeclare" [emphasis added] at all in
the
>above passage. True, it does say that "all XML processors must
recognize"
>the predefined entities. If no redeclaration at all were permitted, the
>sentence beginning "If the entities in question are declared" wouldn't
make
>a lot of sense, right?

There is a similar issue with xml:lang.

Some processors (e.g. early LotusXSL and others) did not have built-in
declarations for xml:lang.  But when you tried to give one, it required
a namespace declaration. And then it would say that declaring an
xml namespace was not allowed.

I think it is a sign of inadequate testing. Developers should check that
their products allow xml:lang in WF, valid and namespaced documents.
Even just putting xml:lang="en-US"  on one  element in a test file
should
expose  the problem.

The spec says "In valid documents, this attribute, like any other, must
be
declared if  it is used."

Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member