• From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@n...>
• To: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 07:12:13 -0700 (PDT)

On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, John E. Simpson wrote:

> Couldn't find any mention of AT&T or Bell Labs (or for that matter, any
> occurrences of the string "phone" except in "phoneme") in the HTML version
> of the paper that Dan pointed to. That I heard of this 7-more-or-less
> theory as "belonging to" AT&T about 20 years after Miller's paper was
> published possibly reflects the embrace-and-extend philosophy: "Not
> invented here... but if it's useful, we can say it was!"

Note, BTW, that the "7 items" theory refers to the limits of *working
memory* only.  In particular, it is completely irrelevant to tasks
involving picking a single item from a displayed list; such tasks require
only *one* item to be held in working memory, regardless of how long the
list is.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Off-topic: Magic Number 7 (WAS: Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??)
    • From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Off-topic: Magic Number 7 (WAS: Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??)
• Next by Date: RE: Off-topic: Magic Number 7 (WAS: Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??)
• Previous by thread: Re: Off-topic: Magic Number 7 (WAS: Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??)
• Next by thread: RE: Off-topic: Magic Number 7 (WAS: Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread