Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Speaking of parsers, and perhaps committing a brand of sacrilege here (almost certainly so from the SGML side of the world) ... ... what do folk think of using the following XML subset: Everything in XML, except the <!DOCTYPE ...> support which takes up something like 2/3 of most parsers. Clearly that'd be subset for which validation doesn't apply; all data integrity would be provided by higher levels. BUT -- it'd be a subset that'd work nicely with all conformant XML parsers (validating and non), it'd support namespaces and all the schema proposals I last heard of, and there should be no issue of size for most environments. - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
