• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: 04 Jun 1999 12:03:31 +0200

* Tim Bray
| 
| I'd agree. I think IE5 is clearly wrong here.  On the other hand,
| Andrew is correct in saying that the microsoft approach is the
| maximally-cautious one, and probably quite defensible in what is
| effectively a release 1.0 product.

I find it interesting to note that if one requires all xmlns
attributes to be #FIXED we have an implementation of namespaces that
is effectively equivalent to the original processing instruction draft.

--Lars M.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML DTDs failing in IE5
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• References:
  • RE: XHTML DTDs failing in IE5
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: ANN: DocZilla Alpha 2 for WinNT/95/98 and Linux
• Next by Date: xsl editor needed
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML DTDs failing in IE5
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML DTDs failing in IE5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread