• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 10:59:20 -0400

Richard Goerwitz scripsit:

> I'm always wondering why all this "for interoperability" language is
> in the spec.

Probably because people believed that SGML tools would be fairly
important in XML work, at least in the beginning.  Except for nsgmls
as a validity checker, I don't believe that turned out to be the case.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Nested DTDs
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Nested DTDs
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
  • Re: Nested DTDs
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Storing application state as XML
• Next by Date: "For Interoperability"
• Previous by thread: Re: Nested DTDs
• Next by thread: Re: Nested DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread