• From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• To: 'XML Developers' List' <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 12:00:34 +0100

David Megginson wrote,
> Of course, Java will still be happier with the second, 
> since String operations in Java are painfully 
> expensive.  What does everyone else think?

I don't think '{URIpart}localpart' will be significantly
more expensive to split in Java than 'URIpart 
localpart' on some reasonable assumptions about what's 
typical (nested braces in URIpart relatively rare; 
localpart short relative to URIpart etc.)

Maybe we need to see the splitting code for the two 
cases?

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                          Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect           5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)181 410 2230                  London, W6 0LJ
msabin@c...           England

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: question for a friend
• Next by Date: Re: question for a friend
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: Namespaces and syntax of compound names
• Next by thread: XML Schema errata (and digest question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread