Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Paul Prescod wrote: > According to RFC 2396, a resource is something addressable by a URI > (without fragment identifier) -- a complete HTML or XML document, not a > part of it. Technically you are correct: there is a discrepancy here between resources accessible by URIs simpliciter, and those accessible by URI references (possibly including anchors). > Also, I find it interesting to note that RDF does not seem to be able to > attach metadata to components of things that are not XML: frames of a > video, records in a database, paragraphs in a Word document and so forth. > We need the ability to do so. This is not an RDF problem; it reflects the fact that nobody has defined the meaning of fragment ids for those media types. Go thou forth and define. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
