• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 18:37:10 -0400

Paul Prescod wrote:

>  1. don't worry about it. We'll have other URN mechanisms soon and today's
> harvesters won't recognize urn:urn-22:foo@b...:blah anyhow.

I suspect this is false, and that harvesters will recognize
"foo@b..." embedded in any text.

> I am leaning toward option 2.

I like option 2 also.

"I do not like this URNish spam!  I do not like it, Sam-I-am!"

"There was only one URN -- but that was URN-22."

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • URNs and SPAM
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Just require URLs
• Next by Date: RE: Just require URLs
• Previous by thread: URNs and SPAM
• Next by thread: IBM's xml4j 2.x and VisualCafe
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread